How has the CIA tied the hands and feet alone in the MCC agreement?
The cycle of masterminds investing in violence, 'coup', 'independent Tibet' and terrorism How has the CIA tied the hands and feet alone in the MCC agreement?
1. Let's study the following provisions carefully! Pursuant to Section 3.8 (a), the person conducting the audit of MCC's income and expenditure shall be 'appointed by the Government at the request of the MCC' or appointed by the MCC and the person to be appointed as the auditor shall be approved by the MCC. You have to make sure it happens. That is, auditors will be appointed only with the approval of US-accredited accounting firms selected by the MCC.
2. As per (c) of Schedule (1), the management unit will be selected only on the basis of 'No Objection' of MCC. This means that the people who will be appointed to run the MCC project will only be people who have been approved by the MCC as 'OK'. Nepal will not be able to make any appointment beyond the MCC's 'No Objection' order.
3. MCA-Nepal is defined as a 'fully autonomous entity' formed on the basis of MCC's direct appointment or on the basis of its 'No Objection' and is free to negotiate with any other party, deal with issues and bank. The right to do banking business by opening an account has been given.
Now let's look at its cycle. No. 1 above. According to the point, the audit of MCC should be done only by him or the person appointed as per his recommendation. According to Article 2, the appointment of persons operating the MCC project will also be made only in the 'No Objection' order of the MCC and point no. According to Article 3, as an autonomous entity, MCC can open a bank account and conduct banking transactions. After becoming autonomous from Nepal's grip, its bank account also became autonomous. Therefore, Nepal did not know where the money was deposited and spent in its account. In this too, after giving e the right to do banking business freely, it was not known what business it does.In order to find out where the money comes from and how the MCC spends it in the name of banking, the auditor is appointed only by people approved by the US accounting firms selected by the MCC. Nepal did not get any details of income and expenditure. The United States has cut off Nepal's hand from all sides in the MCC agreement to ensure investment in Nepal, investment in political "coups", terrorism, or military missions in "independent Tibet." It is clear from this that the United States has tried to enter Nepal under the auspices of the MCC by planning a heinous crime. It may be natural to have a condition that one should be allowed to work, but what is the other reason for Nepal to keep an eye on the audit of funds and expenditure from its management unit?
Contributor: Bharat Dahal